Re: Windows Media Files

My experience with the Automatix always was the best possible one. It allows
you to do a lot of things in a simple and easily way, without any bigger
concerns.

Already I tried the EasyUbuntu but some time ago and I would not know to say
how well it behaves nowadays, in its recent incarnations.

I agree with you about the "RestrictedFormats" advice, something to be
seriously considered. But as you already had made this alert (about
RestrictedFormats) I decided to go ahead and suggest the evaluation of
Automatix.

At the end it is a matter of users choice!

On 1/22/07, Mario Vukelic <mario.vukelic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 23:39 -0300, Antonio Fonseca wrote:
>
> I suggest that you try Automatix 2 (http://www.getautomatix.com) and
> install multimedia codecs, media players and plug-ins for the Firefox
> using it.

I suggest he doesn't, that's why I gave the RestrictedFormats link.
Automatix is a pain:
http://www.netsplit.com/blog/articles/2006/10/30/automatix-and-upgrading

Following the advice in RestrictedFormats is safer and one even learns
something. If it has to be an automated Tool, EasyUbuntu behaves better
than Automatix: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EasyUbuntu


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users


--
ANTONIO FONSECA
http://antoniofonseca.wordpress.com/
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users