Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- From: "Michael Gustafson" <michaelrpg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:58:17 -0500
I believe AIGLX is included by default, so it is the more standard choice.
The ATI drivers (fglrx) don't with AIGLX, so I am forced to use XGL.
On 2/17/07, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina <
mihamina.rakotomandimby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--
Hi,
I plan to install a Linux distribution on my friend's laptop. It has a
nVidia
card, and 3DEffects are supported, I already tested it with many other
distributions, including Edgy.
But I wonder what's the future of Desktop efects on Ubuntu: Is it XGL or
AIGLX?
Because I want to follow the distribution's choice on that point, and dont
want to switch in a near future, if I choose a nearly unsupported
technology.
Thank you for your answers.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- From: Ouattara Oumar Aziz
- Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- References:
- desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
- desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- Prev by Date: Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- Next by Date: Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- Previous by thread: Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- Next by thread: Re: desktop effects: XGL or AIGLX? compiz or beryl?...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|