Re: VMWare / Wine

Derek Broughton wrote:
Ouattara Oumar Aziz wrote:

I'll tell you what I thing are the main differences between Wine (and
its forks : Cedega and CrossOverOffice) and VMware :

Wine :
- no need for windows license

Legally, or practically? Many things you might run under Wine are _legally_
required to have a Windows license.

That's simply not true. Components of Windows need a Windows license,
but there's a whole lot of Windows software that isn't even put out by
Microsoft.

Matthew Flaschen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: VMWare / Wine
    ... its forks: Cedega and CrossOverOffice) and VMware: ... Many things you might run under Wine are _legally_ ... required to have a Windows license. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: VMWare / Wine
    ... its forks: Cedega and CrossOverOffice) and VMware: ... Many things you might run under Wine are ... _legally_ required to have a Windows license. ... I think you'll find that almost all Microsoft software ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: VMWare / Wine
    ... its forks: Cedega and CrossOverOffice) and VMware: ... VMware is as far from being a fork of Wine as can be. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: VMWare / Wine
    ... VMware is as far from being a fork of Wine as can be. ... I was saying Cedega and CrossOverOffice were forks of Wine. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: VMWare / Wine
    ... VMware is as far from being a fork of Wine as can be. ... I was saying Cedega and CrossOverOffice were forks of Wine. ...
    (Ubuntu)