Re: Wireless in ubuntu will not work with static IP address - Wicd installed



Rapael Morcha wrote:
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 10:44:40PM +0200, Nils Kassube wrote:
Rapael Morcha wrote:
What's the encryption mechanism in newer APs? WPA2 or WEP?

I don't know about dedicated APs, but I have 2 different routers with
wireless AP included. Both support WEP, WPA, WPA2. If you use WEP it
will only protect you from newbies. According to an article I read
some months ago, WEP can be cracked within about 1 minute.

Found the article: <http://www.heise-security.co.uk/news/87889>

Now that's interesting! Why would someone even use WEP in their AP?
There seems to be WPA support in Ubuntu already though.

Hmm, I think, WPA support in Ubuntu is not that bright yet. I tried to
make WPA work on my laptop which was running Kubuntu 6.06 LTS (which IS
the current LTS version). Knetworkmanager of that version knows nothing
about WPA. Sad thing: I had to install Kubuntu 7.04, although in the
beginning I switched to Kubuntu because of the time frame of support for
the LTS version.

It's sad some
vendors still seems to use WEP. Do they even care about customers?
Don't seem like that to me from your above post. :)

If you have an old laptop without hardware support for WPA, then WEP is
the only encryption available. Therefore, WEP will probably be available
in new equipment for a long time. If you only have WEP available, you
might as well switch off encryption, because it is no real security.
However, for legal reasons it may be an advantage to keep even WEP
switched on. Then an intruder has to crack the encryption, which is
illegal (at least in some jurisdictions).


Nils

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wireless security? ? ?
    ... There are two major classes of encryption offered, WEP and WPA. ... While WEP can be broken by a knowledgeable hacker, breaking is still difficult and is far beyond the capabilities of even most fairly knowledgeable computer USERS. ... WEP is "good enough" for most private residential users, but if your hardware supports both WEP and WPA, then use WPA. ... Setting up encryption can be quite difficult, especially if you have a mixed vendor environment (e.g. your router and your wireless network card were not all made by the same company). ...
    (comp.sys.laptops)
  • Re: Newbie With Encryption Query
    ... If I have two laptops and set the encryption on ... WEP, WEP2 and WPA. ... I assume this should allow different clients to connect ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)
  • Re: Securing an Ad Hoc Network
    ... The data encryption is set to WEP, however from what I am reading this is a vulnerable method. ... notebooks support WPA or WPA2, ... IN XP sp1 there was an option for "WPA-None", but from what I understand, that wasn't much, if any, more secure than WEP, and is no longer available in sp2. ... Lem MS MVP -- Networking ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Wireless security
    ... networking but I do know ethernet. ... WPA Personal, WPA Enterprise, WPA2 ... WPA2 Enterprise, Radius and WEP. ... Which encryption method should I choose and how do I configure it? ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: BUFFALO WHR-HP-G54 : Does it do WPA2-PSK ??
    ... Encrypt wireless signal with WEP format. ... encryption standard for wireless LANs. ... Wireless clients will need to support TKIP. ...
    (alt.internet.wireless)

Loading