Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:49:16 -0400
Bruce Marshall wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Mario Vukelic wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 22:37 -0400, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
There are cases where a quick message ofThere are better ways for this than a busy boot screen. E.g., enable
a workaround or note during the boot process can give hints of how to
fix a quirk I run into later on.
bootlogging in /etc/default/bootlogd, and/or run dmesg after start,
and/or check your logs
True, but if your machine hangs due to some fs problem or some other hang,
you'd have a tough time running dmesg.
This thread is quickly going to spiral into a rediculously pointless
quagmire if it doesn't disappear soon. :-)
Let's sum it up.
Some people want a black box.
Other people, like sysadmins, like knowing what the machine is doing and
gauge how healthy it is at boot time.
I said, why not just have it as a preference? Luckily, most systems
already have that built into hardware, usually as a small button with an
"O" and "I" marking of some kind on the front of the monitor. Push it
if you don't want to see the bootup. Push it again when the case's
activity light dies down.
:-)
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- From: Mario Vukelic
- Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- References:
- Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- From: John Richard Moser
- Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- From: Bart Silverstrim
- Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- From: Mario Vukelic
- Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- From: Bruce Marshall
- Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- Prev by Date: Re: pdftops
- Next by Date: application removal
- Previous by thread: Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- Next by thread: Re: Boot screen: Quiet or not?
- Index(es):