Re: Problem with Archiving .tar
Chris Lemire wrote:
the gui is crap. if you don't want to use a command once in a while, then
what the hell are you doing with linux. if you want compression, simply
pipe the output to bzip2 or gzip and have then read from standard input.
There's only one possible answer to that garbage.
<plonk>
--
derek
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
Relevant Pages
- [bzip2/lzma] fix for built-in initramfs issue
... architectures which don't do this style of kernel compression. ... available (bzip2 or lzma) or left uncompressed if none is available. ... Support loading of a gzip encoded initial ramdisk or cpio buffer. ... arch/$/Makefile to see the flags used before .incbin was introduced. ...
(Linux-Kernel) - Re: speed of bzip2 versus gzip
... i never measured it to see if it is 50-60 times slower, but yes, gzip ... I wanted to use bzip2 to compress ... then your goal is to obtain the absolute best compression, ... more reasonable if you care about reasonably timely compression. ...
(freebsd-questions) - Re: help on reducing file size while having a readable format
... that there might be a way to achieve significant size reduction, ... Assuming that your program writes it's file to stdout, just pipe the ... To read the file back in, again pipe it through gzip or bzip2, ...
(comp.os.linux.development.apps) - Re: speed of bzip2 versus gzip
... i never measured it to see if it is 50-60 times slower, but yes, gzip ... I wanted to use bzip2 to compress ... then your goal is to obtain the absolute best compression, ... sys 0m0.257s ...
(freebsd-questions) - Re: Linux Kernel Source Compression
... gzip is the winner again. ... usually two to six times more time than lzma, that is, four to twelve ... decompress the faster the smaller the compressed size is, while bzip2 ... gets slower when the compression ratio gets better. ...
(Linux-Kernel) |
|
