Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: "Michael R. Head" <burner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 03:37:07 -0400
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 15:28 +0200, Mario Vukelic wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:11 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
Can you explain how this problem is avoided with gksu, or gksudo? So far
as I can see using one of these causes the application to run with UID
of 0, i.e., root. The app has no knowledge of how it was invoked, so any
files is creates will be owned by root.
Your explanation applies to running any app, not just graphical ones.
http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/graphicalsudo
That page says that "sudo nano /etc/apt/sources.list" is a good idea.
It isn't, and for the same reason graphical apps shouldn't be run
through sudo -- nano will create/edit extra files in your home
directory. In fact, there's a command called "sudoedit" which solves the
problem.
--
Michael R. Head <burner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://www.cs.binghamton.edu/~mike/
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Derek Broughton
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: NoOp
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Karl Larsen
- sudoedit - good catch! was [Re: sudo vs. gksu ]
- From: Peter Garrett
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- References:
- Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome
- From: Mario Vukelic
- sudo vs. gksu (was: Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome)
- From: Markus Schönhaber
- Re: sudo vs. gksu (was: Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome)
- From: Nils Kassube
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Tony Arnold
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Mario Vukelic
- Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome
- Prev by Date: TinyURL (Was: 8.04?)
- Next by Date: Re: Ubufox add-on in Firefox 2.0.0.x
- Previous by thread: Re: sudo vs. gksu
- Next by thread: sudoedit - good catch! was [Re: sudo vs. gksu ]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|