Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Derek Broughton <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:27:08 -0300
Michael R. Head wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 15:28 +0200, Mario Vukelic wrote:
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 14:11 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
Can you explain how this problem is avoided with gksu, or gksudo? So
far as I can see using one of these causes the application to run with
UID of 0, i.e., root. The app has no knowledge of how it was invoked,
so any files is creates will be owned by root.
Your explanation applies to running any app, not just graphical ones.
http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/graphicalsudo
That page says that "sudo nano /etc/apt/sources.list" is a good idea.
It isn't, and for the same reason graphical apps shouldn't be run
through sudo -- nano will create/edit extra files in your home
directory. In fact, there's a command called "sudoedit" which solves the
problem.
Note that with most such situations, it's only a problem if the first time
you use the app you do it with sudo. If you already own the .nano, or
whatever, files then they don't get "reowned" by root (at least not ime).
But I admit I fairly regularly discover some hidden file in my home
directory owned by root - and know that "sudo" was the reason.
--
derek
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome
- From: Mario Vukelic
- sudo vs. gksu (was: Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome)
- From: Markus Schönhaber
- Re: sudo vs. gksu (was: Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome)
- From: Nils Kassube
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Tony Arnold
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Mario Vukelic
- Re: sudo vs. gksu
- From: Michael R. Head
- Re: Nervous Mouse Syndrome
- Prev by Date: RE: install
- Next by Date: Re: Checking the file system every 22 boots
- Previous by thread: Re: sudo vs. gksu
- Next by thread: Re: sudo vs. gksu
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|