Re: Antivirus
- From: "xerces8" <xerces8@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 23:46:04 +0200
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Michael "TheZorch" Haney wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
And of course there's overhead in your AV's running, since they look atI did some research and found that Avast has the lowest impact on your
all execution of files, along with the scheduled checks.
system resources.
It's still there, though.
I'm not a gamer user, I'm not a performance nut, but I do find it
irritating in principal (principle? Too lazy to look it up at the
moment) to be coerced into running something that impacts my system's
memory and CPU usage just because the OS is crap.
So, you are running uCLinux ? After all, you wouldn't want to be
coerced into losing performace (due to MMU) just because the OS
is "crap" ?
;-)
Regards,
David
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Bart Silverstrim
- Re: Antivirus
- References:
- Antivirus
- From: Andrea Monaco
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Hex1a4
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Vitorio Okio
- Re: Antivirus
- From: steve
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Jonathan Dlouhy
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Jonathan Dlouhy
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Bart Silverstrim
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Michael \"TheZorch\" Haney
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Bart Silverstrim
- Antivirus
- Prev by Date: Re: Firefox 3
- Next by Date: Re: Firefox 3
- Previous by thread: Re: Antivirus
- Next by thread: Re: Antivirus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|