Re: Antivirus
- From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:09:02 -0400
xerces8 wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Michael "TheZorch" Haney wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
It's still there, though.And of course there's overhead in your AV's running, since they look atI did some research and found that Avast has the lowest impact on your
all execution of files, along with the scheduled checks.
system resources.
I'm not a gamer user, I'm not a performance nut, but I do find it
irritating in principal (principle? Too lazy to look it up at the
moment) to be coerced into running something that impacts my system's
memory and CPU usage just because the OS is crap.
So, you are running uCLinux ? After all, you wouldn't want to be
coerced into losing performace (due to MMU) just because the OS
is "crap" ?
My microwave is. My toaster died not long ago and the replacement isn't
programmable...
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Antivirus
- From: Andrea Monaco
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Hex1a4
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Vitorio Okio
- Re: Antivirus
- From: steve
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Jonathan Dlouhy
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Ed Greshko
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Jonathan Dlouhy
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Bart Silverstrim
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Michael \"TheZorch\" Haney
- Re: Antivirus
- From: Bart Silverstrim
- Re: Antivirus
- From: xerces8
- Antivirus
- Prev by Date: Re: cant ping website
- Next by Date: Re: How do you monitor startup messages in Ubuntu?
- Previous by thread: Re: Antivirus
- Next by thread: Re: Antivirus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|