Re: Ubuntu gcc header files missing
- From: Peter Garrett <peter.garrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 12:30:46 +1000
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:39:17 -0700
"David Fox" <dfox94085@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Why are all the instructions for software
installation on Ubuntu (that I've run across so far) telling people to
use apt-get rather than aptitude?
Probably ingrained habit :)
aptitude is obviously better in most cases, although the fact that it
removes all packages in a metapackage when used as a removal tool is
not always what I want - so I think apt-get still has its uses,
although I know that aptitude can generally be made to behave in
whatever manner is preferred.
--
Peter Garrett <peter.garrett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Re: Ubuntu gcc header files missing
- From: David Fox
- Re: Ubuntu gcc header files missing
- Prev by Date: Re: Tired of freezing laptop
- Next by Date: Re: Win98 -- all kidding aside
- Previous by thread: Re: Ubuntu gcc header files missing
- Next by thread: Tired of freezing laptop
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|