Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: Florian Diesch <diesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:18:24 +0200
"Nik N" <niknot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To make something (awesomebar, for instance) behave the way you
prefer, by hook and by crook, is one thing. Security is differnet: you
can not ascertain that something is secure a priory, you have no
option but to depend on the competence of the product planner, the
designer and the programmer.
Injecting sqlite into the security chain of the browser demonstrates
incompetence.
What security problems did sqlite have recently that could affect a
web browser?
IMHO replacing mork was a very good decision.
Florian
--
<http://www.florian-diesch.de/>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
** Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature, please! **
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: NoOp
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: NoOp
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- From: Nik N
- Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow down CDROM drive
- Next by Date: Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- Previous by thread: Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- Next by thread: Re: rolling Firefox back to 2.x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|