Re: GUI goodness for your Mouse and Keyboard programming



Hi!

Actually, I need to clarify a few more things... which seem unclear to
Cybe... (see below about licenses, in particular).

Cybe R. Wizard wrote:
Young <tuxman@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:

http://www.hidpoint.com/home.html

HIDPoint can be considered as a Linux version of Logitech’s or
Microsoft’s Keyboard and Mouse configuration software...


I'm not seeing any source code anywhere. Now, I'm not an open source
zealot but if the product /isn't/ open source then your mail to this
mailing list is spam and you a spammer.

Your post definitely DID sound like a zealot, though you probably didn't
mean it that way. I'm going to work under that assumption. :)
Besides, if it's not open source and admittedly uses open source
software as indicated on the credits page you may be more than a
spammer, you may be a criminal.

First, the original poster is not necessarily from hidpoint.com (so he's
not necessarily the criminal).

Second, if they use open source software, they may have full rights to
re-use it, if the original license provides for it. Not all open source
is GPL licensed. CDDL (OpenSolaris), BSD, MPL (Mozilla) to name a few
all allow re-use of code. Even in closed source environments, even in
commercial products, provided that a link to download the ORIGINAL (not
necessarily the modified - CDDL / BSD) source code. That link may be on
their site... like Linksys does for their GPL-based products.

Third, I note, after installing the software, that past the
installation, the software than procedes to DOWNLOAD drivers. In terms
of, say, GPL license, this means that additional downloaded software
isn't considered BUNDLED software. It's not part of the original PROJECT
code. So they could have a completely proprietary application with a
nice installer... and that application could then download perfectly
GPLed drivers... and all they'd have to provide source code for
(possibly just in the form of a link on their site, again) would be the
drivers, but not their proprietary code. GPL only concerns code that is
linked into an original GPL project. By using a separate download of
code, they segment their stuff into separate projects, thus breaking the
GPL link.

Of course, they could also use LGPL code, in which case, provided they
link to it in the ways supported and described in the license, then they
can bundle that LGPL code and only have to provide source for that part,
not the rest.

As you can see, it's VERY possible. In fact, VERY COMMON, to bundle open
source and non open source code in ways that aren't infringing on the
orignial open source license.
Please respond, I'd like for you to clear this all up.

I hope I've helped clarify a significant part.

Gilles.


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users



Relevant Pages

  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    ... Reread the Qt license, Peter. ... your source code to the open source community in accordance with the ... GPL when your application is distributed." ... I'll BUY OpenSource software ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: GUI goodness for your Mouse and Keyboard programming
    ... source and non open source code in ways that aren't infringing on the ... orignial open source license. ... Note that they mention the GPL. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Book on Assembly
    ... Aside from being "not-GPL" can you name a single reason ... you don't want to use his license? ... The GPL. ... Look up what "open source" means sometime. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: GPL version 4
    ... Linking from other software which is not regarded by the FSF as free software, ... is not allowed by this license. ... The GPL version 4 will accept every other license, accepted by the Open Source ... Linking from closed source software to GPLv4 ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: [PHP] Requested PHP apps / sites
    ... To develop full applications in open source technology to someone ... existing user-management framework (allowed by license) or write your ... So instead of free code from me or other developers, I view it as getting free ideas from others, users and seekers of the apps:-) ...
    (php.general)