Re: localhost or LAN addresses in /etc/hosts

Chris G wrote:

On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:51:26PM -0400, Derek Broughton wrote:

I'd say you're just thoroughly misconfigured. You _can't_ have isbd
be
all three addresses. Personally, I don't think if you're running
dnsmasq, isbd should be in there at all - _that's_ why you're running
your own DNS.

dnsmasq uses the entries in /etc/hosts to provide information to other
machines on the LAN. Thus it *needs* an entry for isbd somewhere to
tell other machines what isbd's address is.

"somewhere". It's a long time since I had a configuration using dnsmasq,
but I thought it would use the upstream dns, so if your router is already
doing it, it could get it from there.

Without dnsmasq the addresses for isbd are all perfectly valid as far
as I understand it.

They're "valid" - but you can _still_ only get one result returned, and
I'm not even sure you can guarantee that it will be any specific value
from /etc/hosts. So you do a DNS lookup _from_ your machine and it
doesn't matter whether your result is 127.0.0.1 or 127.0.1.1 or
192.168.whatever, because those are all the addresses of interfaces on
your machine.

Yes, I realise that, I'm not quite sure why there are two but (without
dnsmasq) it doesn't actuall matter.

Historical. All other Debian-based distros, afaik, put your local machine name, along with "localhost", on 127.0.0.1. Ubuntu, for good and logical reasons, decided to put it on 127.0.1.1 (fairly recently - gutsy, I think).

No, I have static addresses assigned so it's correct. Apart from
anything else how, otherwise, would one access things such as printers
(my 192.168.1.44 hp7310 for example), they have to be fixed addresses.

No they don't, they just have to not change as long as they're on the
network.

Now, the real question is what do you mean by "asking for the address
of
isbd"? isbd is, by definition, your local machine, therefore a DNS
lookup should always give you 127.x.x.x. If you mean that you want
the address of the host "isbd" on your local network, then the name
is probably something like "isbd.isbd.net"

I'm talking about finding the address of "isbd" from another machine
on
the LAN. That's what dnsmasq is for, if another machine on the LAN
asks for the address of "isbd" dnsmasq will tell it "192.168.1.4".

Well, no, it shouldn't. It _should_ specify a domain.

127.x.x.x is only the right address for "isbd" when the question is
asked from "isbd".

Any other client doing a lookup should be taking the name "isbd" and
appending its "search domain" and finding the address that way. If, from
your example the search domain is "isbd.net" then dnsmasq should be
returning the correct values for "chris" and "home".
--
derek


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: localhost or LAN addresses in /etc/hosts
    ... your own DNS. ... machines on the LAN. ... Thus it *needs* an entry for isbd somewhere to ... It's a long time since I had a configuration using dnsmasq, ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: localhost or LAN addresses in /etc/hosts
    ... address or an actual LAN address in /etc/hosts? ... My ubuntu server machine's name is isbd, ... This is all very well until one runs something like dnsmasq and get ... localhost addresses when asking for the address of isbd. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: localhost or LAN addresses in /etc/hosts
    ... address or an actual LAN address in /etc/hosts? ... isbd localhost.localdomain localhost ... the ubuntu installation process put them there. ... entries for isbd will break anything. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: localhost or LAN addresses in /etc/hosts
    ... address or an actual LAN address in /etc/hosts? ... isbd localhost.localdomain localhost ... Having multiple IP addresses for one name in /etc/hosts is usually a bad idea. ...
    (Ubuntu)