Re: Binary incompatibility of Linux distributions

On Tue, May 19, 2009 16:10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:

No, he said: "The difference here is that Linux actually makes installing


from source so easy, relatively speaking, it becomes a visible option to
the masses, whereas in Windows word, that kind of procedure would be way
too daunting to even be considered among non-developers."

and 'I' asked him whether he thinks 'tar zxf tarball.tgz, cd tarball,
./configure, make,
make install' is 'so easy'.

Compared to the Windows world, yes it is a lot easier.

To do something similar on Windows, you would have to install Visual
Studio, which is very expensive, or Visual Studio Express, which doesn't
have all the whistles and bells of the full Visual Studio.
Perhaps there are other "free" software development solutions for Windows,
I don't know. But while gcc (and friends) is most used on Linux, Visual
Studio is most used on Windows. Let's not argue about that, shall we?

To compile a package from source in Linux, you have to go to a console and
type the following:

tar -xvf source.tar.gz
cd directory
./configure
make
sudo make install

5 little lines of text that can be put on a website for easy copy/pasting.

For the Windows trolls/fanboys: there is absolutely no way whatsoever that
you can do something similar with Visual Studio by copy/pasting five lines
to a console. If there is, please enlighten me.

Er, yes, that's _exactly_ why they weren't included. Debian always
included the components of "build-essential". Ubuntu explicitly chose
to not include it because it was intended as an "end-user" distro, and
"would not be needed by most users".

Is that true?
I haven't noticed, because I always install my Ubuntu "the Debian way"
with debootstrap, and build-essential is always one of the packages that I
install with debootstrap.
If a regular Ubuntu doesn't install build-essential, I consider that a bug
and I will file a bug report about it.

--
Amedee


--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re: Newbie
    ... I have always been a windows user, I tried Linux about two years ... I suffered years of grief and misery with all versions of windows, ... did you really give Ubuntu a fair trial? ... get yourself the Ubuntu CD and try a fresh install. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: OT - help request for the Dark Side
    ... Or some apps may simply fail to function - IRC, news readers, ... The main reason people used to install Little Snitch (don't tell me any ... Then they're only familiar with WP and mail as is used on a Windows ... several PS's and the Ubuntu box would have been nice. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Cant install Ubuntu successfully along side WindowsXP
    ... Dual booting with Ubuntu 32 bit. ... Finally install was completed and I rebooted. ... Windows partition and on the Ubuntu partition. ...
    (alt.os.linux)
  • Re: HELP WINDOWS XP
    ... , my mate who often asks my help is not, so I am going to ... When I first started to install Ubuntu on this PC, ... question was 'How can I be certain its not going to trash my Windows ... now also have an unfamiliar boot process (but still no usable Ubuntu). ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Get ubuntu ! Get ubuntu ! Get ubuntu ! Get ubuntu !
    ... If one does decide to try Ubuntu, get the "LTS", because the 6mo release intervals is "bleeding edge" and can/will cause you trouble. ... install the OS, I install the programs they want and I show them how to use Ubuntu. ... So, having to figure out that they need NDIS Wrapper, for example, to install a Windows written driver for wireless in order to get their wireless working at all, is expecting quite a lot from general users who don't have the $$'s or just don't want to PAY someone to get it all working. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)