Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- From: Jay Daniels <tux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:25:49 -0400
On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 21:57 -0700, Smoot Carl-Mitchell wrote:
David McNally wrote:
So, which one do you folks think is better, and why?
I use Evo, but only because I have had to deal with Exchange email and
Exchange calendaring in my consulting and I refuse to use Outlook. I do
like Evo's virtual folders. They do make it easy to organize and sort
email.
I run the latest snapshot, since there was a fair bit of breakage with
the standard Ubuntu release. There is a nifty Makefile which you can
get which makes the builds pretty simple.
http://www.go-evolution.org/Compiling_Evolution_from_SVN
If you do not need the added Evo functionality, Thunderbird is a fine
and quite stable email client.
Are you able to compile the latest cvs version of evo on Hardy? Have
you tried checkinstall to create debs?
jay
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- From: Smoot Carl-Mitchell
- Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- References:
- Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- From: David McNally
- Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- From: Andrew Farris
- Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- From: Smoot Carl-Mitchell
- Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- Prev by Date: Re: error creating the child process for this terminal
- Next by Date: barry
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution vs. Thunderbird
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|