Re: OT: Network Cable Tester
- From: David Curtis <dcurtis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:19:59 -0400
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:01:56 -0600
drew einhorn <drew.einhorn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are some dirt cheap Chinese ones.
I bought one and sorted out a bunch of bad cables.
It was already worth the money I'd spent.
Then the tester died.
What did I expect?
It was dirt cheap.
I'm looking for something better.
I think I see folks selling the dirt cheap
tester for a lot more money. Maybe
it's a knock off of a better tester and
the pictures just look the same.
For a whole lot of money I can get
something that does bandwidth testing,
and prints fancy reports, ...
I can't afford anything like that.
I'm looking for something that's durable.
I can count on it lasting, and being able
to use it tomorrow.
Checks for opens, shorts, and miswired pairs.
Hmm. I wonder if some similarly and reasonably priced
testers can detect more kinds of wiring errors.
Any recommendations?
Do you have margins set at 50-60 characters or were we supposed to read
that in iambic pentameter? :)
If you're working with devices at height, wireless APs,security cameras
etc. save up for something that's not going to explode the first time
you drop it off a six foot ladder, ie. has a nice rubber jacket.
I'm also partial to Fluke, but there are others.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- OT: Network Cable Tester
- From: drew einhorn
- OT: Network Cable Tester
- Prev by Date: Re: Ubuntu and static IP address
- Next by Date: Re: Openoffice Letterhead
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Network Cable Tester
- Next by thread: Setting LANG env on Ubuntu
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|