Re: 32 or 64??
- From: "Karl F. Larsen" <klarsen1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:10:23 -0700
anubis wrote:
On 01/30/2010 05:38 PM, RobertHoltzman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:56:10PM -0500, anubis wrote:The part about being "safe" by avoiding 64bit. Sounds like evoking fear.
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 13:44 -0500, Clemens Eisserer wrote:Excuse me but could you point out what about the quoted message is FUD?
Please stop with this FUD.I'll be installing on an HP G71-340US with 4GB RAM. It came withSo running a 32-bit OS, you won't be able to use all those 4GB, but a
64-bit Windows 7 installed.
bit less (say 3,5GB).
But again, keep in mind applications running in 64-bit mode uses more
memory, so you won't gain a lot here.
If you want to, install a 64-bit system, if you want to be absolutly
on the safe side go for a 32-bit OS.
Most likely you won't regret any of those choices.
- Clemens
If you have a 64bit machine with more than 3+ GB of ram install and use
the 64bit OS. Don't listen to any of this fear, uncertainty and
disinformation in this thread. One would think this issue has been long
dead and solved, but here we are again.
You sound certain, but uninformed, as nothing is unsafe about running
64bit. So,that covers the fear,uncertainty, and disinformation.
Basically, you have no idea what you are talking about.
Why is this question ever asked? There are people who use 64
bit and are fat,dumb, and happy. There are people who use 32
bit and are fat,dumb, and happy.
Just leave this question alone.
73 karl
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
Key ID = 3951B48D
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- References:
- 32 or 64??
- From: Raquel
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Swapnil Jain
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Karl F. Larsen
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Raquel
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Robert Spanjaard
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Raquel
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Clemens Eisserer
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: anubis
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: RobertHoltzman
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: anubis
- 32 or 64??
- Prev by Date: Re: 32 or 64??
- Next by Date: Re: [Karmic] NX Remote (NoMachine)
- Previous by thread: Re: 32 or 64??
- Next by thread: Re: 32 or 64??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|