Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Steve Flynn <anothermindbomb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:22:45 +0000
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Karl F. Larsen <klarsen1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was disappointed you did not explain to us that it is
simply stupid to buy more ram so you can try 64 bit.
You do realise that you could simply install the Ubuntu 64bit version
on your exisiting machine without dropping 90 bucks on more ram.
Have you checked that your motherboard will actually recognise more than 4 Gb?
P.S. what was the title for your thesis? I'd quite like to read it.
--
Steve
When one person suffers from a delusion it is insanity. When many
people suffer from a delusion it is called religion.
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Karl F. Larsen
- Re: 32 or 64??
- References:
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Karl F. Larsen
- Re: 32 or 64??
- Prev by Date: Re: 32 or 64??
- Next by Date: Re: Correcting users
- Previous by thread: Re: 32 or 64??
- Next by thread: Re: 32 or 64??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|