Re: 32 or 64??
- From: "Karl F. Larsen" <klarsen1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:21:39 -0700
Gilles Gravier wrote:
Hi!I did and yes it doesn't say how much but RAM is chopped up
On 02/02/2010 16:45, Karl F. Larsen wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:Documentation is a good place to start. If your machine is a laptop and
You may be right! Wonder how I find out if that is true?It has 4 plugs for RAM so it will take that much. I just ranI bet 256MB of RAM has been alotted for another purpose: graphics
top and for some reason I have 1801764000 bytes of RAM now
which if you simplify is 1.8 GB. I wonder why not 2.0 GB?
the onboard graphics controler uses "shared" memory with the system,
then that's it.
Also... in a shell window, type "dmesg | more" and look in the first few
pages... you can see that memory is reserved by the BIOS for various
features...
Gilles
to many uses.
My 9.10 64bit .iso has arrived so off to see if it runs...
73 Karl
--
Karl F. Larsen, AKA K5DI
Linux User
#450462 http://counter.li.org.
Key ID = 3951B48D
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Steve Lamb
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Johnneylee Rollins
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Karl F. Larsen
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Steve Flynn
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Karl F. Larsen
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher
- Re: 32 or 64??
- From: Karl F. Larsen
- Re: 32 or 64??
- Prev by Date: Re: 32 or 64??
- Next by Date: Re: Xorg often taking a lot of CPU, whole system slow
- Previous by thread: Re: 32 or 64??
- Next by thread: Re: 32 or 64??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|