Re: Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- From: Serge van Ginderachter <serge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 10:23:08 +0100
On 5 March 2010 23:21, M. Milanuk <memilanuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the past (6-8yrs ago) I had pretty good luck with some Dell
refurbished workstations... so I started wondering if maybe their
refurbished low-end servers might be a better idea than a
run-of-the-mill desktop PC pressed into server duty. Given that the
load is extremely *low* (primarily backup file storage server for 2-4
people) in this situation, I'm more just interested in the hardware
lasting a good long while without having replace parts and/or the
computer for the forseeable future.
Any experience or comments on the matter?
For a home server, you might want to take the power consumption into
consideration, especially if you plan to keep that box running all day long.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Serge van Ginderachter
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- From: Michael Willenbuecher
- Re: Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- References:
- Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- From: M. Milanuk
- Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- Prev by Date: Re: Lucid changed background color
- Next by Date: Re: external hard disk not recognized
- Previous by thread: Re: Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- Next by thread: Re: Home LAN server: old PC hardware vs. refurb. server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|