Re: Windows Rant
- From: Basil Chupin <blchupin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:30:31 +1000
On 12/07/10 00:06, Rashkae wrote:
Basil Chupin wrote:
You just swapped in another hard drive and "Ubuntu worked just fine" -Apples and Oranges. The OP was talking about moving 1 hard drive to a
and without having to make any alterations to fstab (as a for-instance)?
XP won't even let you change the colour of your underwear without
wanting to be "authenticated" again. But stating what you did about
Ubuntu, me thinks is kinda going a tad overboard :-) .
I must say that this was the case some time ago, but no longer. All to
do with UUID I think. But then I am more wrong than right... :-( .
different machine, wich works just fine in Ubuntu as is. Your talking
about changing the harddrive in the same machine, which does require
updating fstab.
Ummm, sorry, but aren't you just getting just a bit off the mark here?
What is the difference of moving an HD from one Ubuntu running computer
to another Ubuntu running computer - where it will be an unrecognised
device - to putting in a new HD on "the same machine" where it will be
an unrecognised device?
What am I missing here? And I do admit that it is my bed time.
BC
--
I used to be conceited but now I know I am perfect.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows Rant
- From: TopBot .
- Re: Windows Rant
- References:
- Windows Rant
- From: NoOp
- Re: Windows Rant
- From: TopBot .
- Re: Windows Rant
- From: Basil Chupin
- Re: Windows Rant
- From: Rashkae
- Windows Rant
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Rant
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Rant
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Rant
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Rant
- Index(es):