Re: Random numbers
- From: Goh Lip <g.lip@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 14:17:57 +0800
On Tuesday 02,November,2010 11:21 PM, C de-Avillez wrote:
Verifying true randomess on PRNGs is considered a hard problem.
Of course, it all depends on what you need to do. If all you need is
to get a*single* digit, then taking the next digit from the
expansion of Pi would probably be enough.
Good input/info from you and Sandy. Thanks.
I agree;-)But, it's okay to disagree, or to be wrong.:)
But not to be wrongful.
Regards - Goh Lip
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: rikona
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: Basil Chupin
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: rikona
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: Joep L. Blom
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: Goh Lip
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: Joep L. Blom
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- From: Goh Lip
- Random numbers
- From: C de-Avillez
- Re: Not a desperately urgent request but a quick solution would be very nice - it's about a Biorhythm program
- Prev by Date: Re: are there any apt-get command method to get gcc 4.4.3's source code?
- Next by Date: Re: nQgrËx
- Previous by thread: Re: Random numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Random numbers
- Index(es):
