Re: Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- From: Christopher Chan <christopher.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:45:43 +0800
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 12:41 PM, Smokin Chevy wrote:
My thoughts are that Ubuntu is probably the closest and being mainstream
desktop ready but they just aren't quite there yet.
Anyone with constructive thoughts?
Get a Nvidia based graphics solution...
The radeon driver/fglrx is probably not up to snuff from the looks of it.
As for the rest...if you do get a Nvidia card...you might want to give
OpenIndiana a whirl too. Maybe the desktop implementation there is better...
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- From: Smokin Chevy
- Re: Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- From: Smokin Chevy
- Re: Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- References:
- Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- From: Smokin Chevy
- Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- Prev by Date: RE: E100 Driver
- Next by Date: OS recovery
- Previous by thread: Re: Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- Next by thread: Re: Desktop OS: To be or not to be...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|