Re: Desktop clients and NetworkManager
- From: Tom H <tomh0665@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 03:12:07 -0400
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Niki Kovacs <contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm considering removing the NetworkManager to keep only a "traditional"
network configuration, e. g. one DHCP server, and then only dhclient and the
according stanza in /etc/network/interfaces.
I wonder if there's something to gain by it (as in: one service less, more
transparent configuration, more KISS-like configuration) Any advice on this?
I'm not a big fan of NM (although it seems to be getting better with
every version).
I don't think that you'd be gaining much in terms of cpu and
performance footprint by purging NM.
I don't do any desktop support, but I imagine that if a user has a
network problem, it'd be practical to be able to ask him/her to click
on the network icon, etc.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- Desktop clients and NetworkManager
- From: Niki Kovacs
- Desktop clients and NetworkManager
- Prev by Date: Re: New linux wiki up
- Next by Date: Re: Reading CD & DVD discs => "Error File not found."
- Previous by thread: Desktop clients and NetworkManager
- Next by thread: hibernate with swap+swapfile?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|