Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: "Douglas S. Saylor" <absdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 14:18:37 -0400
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 10:40 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote:
It has nothing to do with what's "new," but that what is new is of lower
functionality
and configurability than that which was replaced. It is never a good
thing to remove
them.....period! For example, take a good long look at the new KDE for
an example
of all the graphic "goodies" many want yet with the configurability and
functionality
that is mandated by more than a casual user who only reads email and web
pages.
Options & choices can confuse & frustrate, as counterintuitive as that
may sound, it's true! Ever heard of a book: The Paradox of Choice - Why
More Is Less by Barry Schwartz. The target audience for Ubuntu 11.04 has
NEVER seen Linux. Give THEM (we don't count) too many unfamiliar
choices; they won't choose Linux. Give the AVERAGE automobile driver
(cost, repairs aside) the option to have manual or automatic
transmission MOST will choose NOT to choose gear selection: automatic is
preferred by most (I HATE automatic transmission BTW)
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Fred A. Miller
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Chris Jones
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Thierry de Coulon
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- References:
- Unity ROCKS!!!
- From: Justin Stanczak
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Liam Proven
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Douglas S. Saylor
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Thierry de Coulon
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Liam Proven
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Douglas S. Saylor
- Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- From: Fred A. Miller
- Unity ROCKS!!!
- Prev by Date: 1/2 dozenth request over 3-years
- Next by Date: Re: 1/2 dozenth request over 3-years
- Previous by thread: Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- Next by thread: Re: Unity ROCKS not!!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|