Re: Askubuntu, was : Re: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal release review from other users‏

Am Donnerstag, den 09.06.2011, 13:51 +0100 schrieb Liam Proven:
Statement: the name, appearance & branding of makes it
look like an official, Ubuntu-run site.

Question: is it?

Answer: no. It is a 3rd party site owned & run by a 3rd party.
what makes you think that ?

its content is driven by canonical and the ubuntu community, using the
official ubuntu branding approved by canonical ....
... on top of a system that is simply not hosted by canonical, does that
make it "unofficial" ?

if canonical would move its build services to an amazon cloud, would you
then say that ubuntu isnt "official" anymore ?


ubuntu-users mailing list
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Book on Servers
    ... Am Donnerstag, den 03.07.2008, 05:43 -0600 schrieb Karl Larsen: ... A book written for Ubuntu Hardy ... ubuntu server LTS is supported for 5 years ... ... Hi Oli, I am not aware of the LTS and it's 5 year cycle. ...
  • Re: Upgrading Edubuntu to Dapper.
    ... Am Donnerstag, den 08.06.2006, 00:32 +0100 schrieb Daniel Carrera: ... can just use the Ubuntu one and whether that would work. ...
  • Re: other edgy sources ?
    ... that is what I looking for in ubuntu. ... Am Donnerstag, den 26.10.2006, 23:08 -0400 schrieb Richard: ... that adds allot more enhancements.. ...