Re: PenDrive Linux vs full install?
- From: Mark Widdicombe <markwiddicombe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:38:38 +0200
On 21 July 2011 14:30, Gilles Gravier <ggravier@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
It works very well. I have 10.04 on a stick which I thrust into my
Hi!
I am looking at having a Ubuntu (11.04) system on a USB stick. I have a
16GB stick available for that.
If I take the Ubuntu Live CD and the USB installer, I can get something
easily, working nicely, with some persistance... the Universal USB
Installer lets me define 4 GB of on-stick storage. Nice. Inconvenient :
no updates to Ubuntu on this system. It's always what was put on the
stick when I installed 11.04 Live CD. Advantage : very easy to do. In
fact, by the time I finish typing this mail, it will be done.
Other option : put the USB stick in a machine. A CD in same machine...
and perform a full installation of Ubuntu on that USB stick...
Advantages, I can then run full updates. The whole stick is a disk with
Ubuntu and data on it. Complete persistance of state. But... what are
the inconvenients? Anybody try that? What do you think?
employer's PC. I haven't used their Windows (what's that?) for over a
year. It is perhaps s bit slower than running from an internal hard
drive.
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- References:
- PenDrive Linux vs full install?
- From: Gilles Gravier
- PenDrive Linux vs full install?
- Prev by Date: Re: PenDrive Linux vs full install?
- Next by Date: Re: PenDrive Linux vs full install?
- Previous by thread: Re: PenDrive Linux vs full install?
- Next by thread: Sound server & mic problem on 10.04
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|