Re:

On 08/13/2011 05:22 PM, Tero Pesonen wrote:
You said saving bandwith was the entire justification for plain text; it
is not the justification for me, as my earlier reply explained. Nor is
to other users whom I know to prefer plaintext. So in case yours was
meant to be a universal statement, let me opine that that no, bandwith
restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext.

I can't tell if this is the straw man playing with fire or if this is
just plain trolling either way, just because I state it's the
justification means it's obviously about /only me/?

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Re:
    ... is not the justification for me, ... restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext. ... message with plaintext and HTML portions, as is common now, which I ... Now you know, sin no more, you are absolved. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Re:
    ... is not the justification for me, ... restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext. ... old geeks are used to using plain text and for eons bandwidth has ... Now you know, sin no more, you are absolved. ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Re:
    ... Obviously when oy wrote that the entire justification for ... plaintext is bandwith restrictions, you of course meant that this is the ... bandwith plays no role what so ever. ... BOTH html and plaintext that person had respected *everyone's* ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: Re:
    ... is not the justification for me, ... restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext. ... plaintext is bandwith restrictions, you of course meant that this is the ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re:
    ... is not the justification for me, ... restrictions are not the only justified reason to send plaintext. ... but I interpreted it the same way Tero did. ... *not* seem to refer to you only. ...
    (Ubuntu)