Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Avi Greenbury <lists@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:18:52 +0100
Bill Stanley wrote:
I read the linked webpage and judging from the reader comments, this
website is hardly neutral.
Well, no, of course it's not neutral. Almost all the reporting is either
viewing it as a good thing or a bad thing.
The opinions are distinctly pro-Windows. It's not surprising that
they paint a pretty face on things. They say that Microsoft did not
directly develop the protocol and are simply implementing it.
Which, while besides the point, is true.
My question is how much support in terms of money and free manpower
did they contribute.
I'm intrigued - why would that matter?
the support came from M$.
Please don't do that. It's 'MS'.
--
Avi
--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Ernest Doub
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- References:
- Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Bill Stanley
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Sharl.Jimh.Tsin
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Haneef Bashir
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Doug
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: scott
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Goh Lip
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Colin Watson
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Goh Lip
- Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- From: Bill Stanley
- Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- Prev by Date: Re: [ADMIN] Additional moderator(s) sought for ubuntu-users list
- Next by Date: Re: [ADMIN] Additional moderator(s) sought for ubuntu-users list
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- Next by thread: Re: Windows 8's use of the UEFI Secure Boot
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|