Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?
From: ghost of filth (unh_at_ly.org)
Date: 12/23/03
- Next message: Ivan Marsh: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Previous message: Jean-Pierre Denis: "Re: Turn $6 into $60,000 in 90 days, GUARANTEED"
- Next in thread: Ivan Marsh: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Reply: Ivan Marsh: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Reply: Richard Adams: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:41:56 GMT
For example, why would someone remain following
the 2.4 (branch?) while there is 2.5 and now 2.6?
Is the eventual abandonment of a given kernel version
(e.g., 2.0) timed with hardware obsolescense?
- Next message: Ivan Marsh: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Previous message: Jean-Pierre Denis: "Re: Turn $6 into $60,000 in 90 days, GUARANTEED"
- Next in thread: Ivan Marsh: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Reply: Ivan Marsh: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Reply: Richard Adams: "Re: Why are multiple kernel versions maintained?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]