Google to challenge Micro$haft?
From: Happy Thoughts (BogusAddress_at_no.spam.com)
Date: 04/14/04
- Previous message: june_at_vf.shawcable.net: "Pokeing a snake up my vagina 61"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:08:59 GMT
Here's a very interesting article from the LA Times that I think is
worth reading:
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-google14apr14,1,784097.story?coll=la-home-business
Some See a Challenge to Microsoft in Google's Sites
By Chris Gaither
Times Staff Writer
April 14, 2004
Is Google Inc. arming itself to challenge Microsoft Corp.'s Windows
software by developing an operating system that lives on the Internet?
The closely held search-engine company has been clear that its goal is
to organize the world's information. But its followers have been seeing
that lofty mission statement in a whole new light since Google unveiled
plans this month for a free e-mail service — with enough storage space
for every user to hoard nearly 500,000 pages of messages.
The Gmail service, combined with the enormous cluster of computers that
processes the hundreds of millions of search queries that go through
Google each day, has some technologists salivating over what the
ambitious company may do next.
"Who needs Windows when anyone can have free unlimited access to the
world's fastest computer running the smartest operating system?" Jason
Kottke, a website designer in New York, wrote in his Web log at Kottke.org.
Google executives declined to comment on their plans. "We don't
speculate about what we may or may not be thinking about in terms of
projects," said Craig Silverstein, the company's director of technology.
By all accounts, the Mountain View, Calif., company isn't openly gunning
for Microsoft. Netscape Communications Corp., whose Web browser
threatened Windows, made that mistake in the late 1990s and got
smothered by Microsoft tactics that a federal judge later found violated
antitrust laws.
But Google has been quietly building one of the world's largest
supercomputers, reportedly made of more than 100,000 servers. The
computing system — running on the free operating system called Linux —
is becoming a powerful platform that could be put to uses beyond simply
powering the most popular search engine on the Web.
"I wouldn't underestimate the audacity of any of the goals the Google
guys have," said Rich Skrenta, chief executive of a search engine for
news called Topix.net. "They're big thinkers."
Google has expanded its early offerings to include searchable news
feeds, comparison shopping, software for publishing Web logs, a social
networking service and, now, Gmail.
Many believe Google's next step will be to use its unmatched processing
and storage capacity to invite people to house things on its network
that they normally keep on their computer desktops, such as documents,
digital photos, spreadsheets and songs. All those files would be
accessible from any Internet-connected device and easily searchable
using the technology that made Google famous.
That could mean trouble for Microsoft. The more you can do on the
Internet, the less important your PC becomes. Indeed, Microsoft Chairman
Bill Gates has been worrying about the Internet making Windows less
relevant since 1995 and has invested billions of dollars in developing
new Web programs and services.
"It may be that what's on the Internet is much more important than
what's on the desktop," said Eric Brewer, a computer science professor
at UC Berkeley and co-founder of Inktomi, the search engine company
acquired by Yahoo Inc.
Microsoft executives declined to comment on the potential threat from
Google or on plans of their own.
Marc Andreessen, a Netscape co-founder who serves as chairman of Opsware
Inc., figures Google will boost its offering of free online storage in
the next few years from 1 gigabyte for Gmail to as much as 100 gigabytes
for a much wider range of PC-like services.
"It's very logical to think Google will add these kinds of
capabilities," he said.
Others believe Google may go further. John Battelle, a co-founder of
Wired magazine who is writing a book on Internet searching, said he
could envision a Google word processor. Documents could be stored on
Google's servers, which would allow writers to query helpful reference
sites while they type.
Kottke and Danny Sullivan, editor of Search Engine Watch, said Google
should even be thinking about selling a Google PC. It could run a
version of Linux with Google's search technology built in and include an
open-source alternative to the Microsoft Office suite of business
software. After all, they noted, Google already sells a server computer,
the Google Search Appliance, that lets firms search their internal or
public websites.
Just because Google could feasibly market its own computer or desktop
software doesn't mean it will. In part, the decision depends on the
success — or failure — of Gmail. Google plans to pay for the free e-mail
storage by scanning messages, then displaying ads related to the
content. Privacy advocates have criticized the practice, and it remains
to be seen whether consumers will accept it.
If Google executives intend to expand their online offerings or get into
the PC business, it wouldn't be wise for them to say so and risk baiting
the world's most powerful software firm.
"If they had made that decision, it's entirely in their best interest
not to tell anybody," Battelle said.
But the PC strategy could be an effective way for Google to counter
Microsoft before the Redmond, Wash., goliath strikes at Google. Gates
has vowed to best Google by building a search engine; if it were built
directly into the PC desktop, searchers could find information without
having to open an Internet browser and launch the Google home page.
"I'm sure the strategic wheels are turning overtime in Redmond,"
Battelle said.
They should be, say observers who see Google as a potentially formidable
foe precisely because it doesn't compete in Microsoft's traditional markets.
Microsoft executives are in position to understand that better than
anyone: The software company loosened IBM Corp.'s grip on the computer
business by recognizing that power rested in controlling PC operating
systems, not in building computers, said Tim O'Reilly, a publisher of
technical books.
"That's one of [Google's] powerful secret weapons," he said. "They're
not playing by the same rules."
If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at
latimes.com/archives.
Article licensing and reprint options
Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times
-- Political, pro-choice, gay-friendly, vegetarian, ballet/dance, humorous, patriotic, and other items: www.SmartAssProducts.com
- Previous message: june_at_vf.shawcable.net: "Pokeing a snake up my vagina 61"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]