2003 Server vs. Linux

From: someoneelse (iheard_at_you.com)
Date: 08/11/04 

Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 04:12:54 -0400

Suppose I have a machine with 2Gigs of RAM, 3Gig Processor and 100G Raid.
I'd like to start a hosting business with an online automated sign up form.

Would I be better off running Linux/Apache/PHP or Windows 2003
Server/IIS/dotnet?

Which could host more domains?

Which would require less maintenance hours?

Which would cost less?

Which would require less development time?

What should I do?

Thanks for any comments ;-)

Relevant Pages

  • 2003 Server vs. Linux
    ... Suppose I have a machine with 2Gigs of RAM, 3Gig Processor and 100G Raid. ... I'd like to start a hosting business with an online automated sign up form. ... Which would require less development time? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Crosshair MB problem installing XP 64 Pro
    ... This is the first computer that I am using raid on so I am hoping the I am doing that correctly. ... In bios I set the sata 1 through 4 to raid and set the sata 2 to raid mode. ... I have tried installing XP with 2 sticks of ram and 1 ... problem with hardware, from some software issue. ...
    (alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.asus)
  • Upgrade to fix reboot problem
    ... ram and a cheap 300 watt power supply. ... array using the MB's onboard Promise raid. ... Now I think I may upgrade my currant machine modestly to buy ... rebuilt machine would still be used mainly for file storage ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.help_and_support)
  • Upgrade to fix reboot problem
    ... ram and a cheap 300 watt power supply. ... array using the MB's onboard Promise raid. ... Now I think I may upgrade my currant machine modestly to buy ... rebuilt machine would still be used mainly for file storage ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Upgrade to fix reboot problem
    ... ram and a cheap 300 watt power supply. ... array using the MB's onboard Promise raid. ... Now I think I may upgrade my currant machine modestly to buy ... rebuilt machine would still be used mainly for file storage ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)