Re: Linux, Oracle, Weblogic?

From: J.O. Aho (user_at_example.net)
Date: 10/28/04


Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:41:31 +0200

harry wrote:
> Sorry for being a bit thick (& cross- posting) but I'm a basically a
> complete newbie to Linux & need to get up & running pretty quickly.
>
> I been asked to setup a Linux box on a PC running Oracle 9i & Weblogic 8.1.
>
> The version of Linux I install is not that important as long as I can get
> the 2 app's above working - that's where I've hit a brick wall.

The two apps I think you can download from Oracle (at least Iracle9i), and
they include a README file which explains how to start the installer, this
usually a java application and works the same regadles of environment.

> I thought I'd find a Oracle & WL version say for FreeBSB or Redhat & go with
> that Linux version ah ha but -

RedHat and Oracle are cooperating, so RedHat is IMHO the best choise.

> from Oracle's site I get these options -
> Oracle9i Database Release 2 Enterprise/Standard Edition for Linux
> x86-64 New (03-May-04)
> Oracle9i Database Release 2 Enterprise/Standard Edition for Linux
> New (26-Mar-04)
>
> I assume it's the top one? coz of the x86 bit?

The x86-64 means a 64bits processor, most likely the 64bit processor from
Intel. The second one is the 32bits version of the x86 (Pentium
1-4/Celeron/Xenon & AMD Athlon/Duron).

> from BEA's site
> http://commerce.bea.com/showproduct.jsp?family=WLP&major=8.1&minor=3 the
> only option I get is "Red Hat Enterprise Linux (Pentium)

You can test with RedHat 7.3, which still can be downloaded, but aren't
anymore supported by RedHat, but there is a Fedora project which provides most
vital updates for RedHat 7.3. RedHat 7.3 is the base used to make RedHat Ent2.

> So now totally confused - if I get hold of Red Hat Ent & x86-64 is this
> likely to work or can I put them both on FreeBSD (only saying this as a
> friend highly recommends it!)

You are mixing the binaries, they are for different CPUs, as long as you don't
have a 64bit CPU, you can't use software specially compiled for it. If you
have a 64bit CPU on the machine, then you would need the proper version of
RedHat, best place to look for it is at the RedHat site, www.redhat.com.

FreeBSD is more difficult to setup than RedHat, so I wouldn't recommend it,
stick for the RedHat setup (x86 version of both RedHat and the Oracle software).

  //Aho



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dual head display with RedHat 9.0?
    ... How does one configure RedHat 9.0 for a dual-hdr display? ... The install goes well - no apparent problems. ... >With the first install I basically punted on video card and monitor ... RedHat Linux looks pretty nice, including the desktop. ...
    (linux.redhat.install)
  • Re: Viruses and hackers make Windows more secure - Gates
    ... Windows, I'm running Linux. ... But I have to remind you, that Redhat is not Linux. ... You can chose to install workstation ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: Is linux free
    ... "> Go to the websites of Redhat, Mandriva or mandrake, Suse, Mepis, etc. ... No ISOs are available for download. ... "> there who would allow you to download linux. ... What you would be paying for is *direct support services*. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: I have installed Red Hat Enterprise illegally!
    ... >> Red Hat from the net. ... so I visited my local bookshop to purchase a book on Linux. ... What Redhat does own is their logos and the name Redhat. ... >is install your new distro in the same partition that you installed RHEL. ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • Re: Installing Linux "more or less from scratch"
    ... I indicated in my initial post my "success stories" with Linux ... All this happened on a machine where RedHat ... and later would install and be fully functional (networking, ...
    (comp.os.linux.setup)