Re: Video editing in Linux?
From: Andy Fraser (andyfraser31_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: J.O. Aho: "Re: Groupware for linux"
- Previous message: Erich Trowbridge: "Groupware for linux"
- In reply to:(deleted message) SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Next in thread: Ian Molton: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:25:55 +0000
In alt.comp.linux, SjT uttered these immortal words:
>>That makes no sense at all. The top Linux groups? What the hell are they
>>when they're at home?
>
> Linux groups are a group of people who help other people and host
> files for other linux users to download.. Is this what you mean?!
I was asking what *you* meant. Are you talking about SourceForge and
Freshmeat?
> Or were you looking for their url's?
I already have the official URLs.
>>> It's still an issue with OSS.
>>
>>I'm not disputing that. It's also an issue with CSS. You really don't have
>>a clue do you?
>
> Well just because it's an issue with CSS doesn't make it right does
> it?!
Where did I say it was right?
> A few people have said that OSS is better than CSS and in truth it has
> the same faults, if not more, and it also has it's advantages, and
> probably more so than CSS.
>
> It's swings and roundabouts.
Have you ever thought about entering politics? There are a lot of words that
but they don't really say anything.
[snip]
> You cannot download the source code for CSS and modify it to breach
> the end users security, it just cannot be done, yet it is possible
> with OSS, open your eyes before starting to label me as a troll.
I'm not the one with my eyes closed.
> If you cannot reply without acting like a big upset kid then don't
> bother because it's not helping anyone, least of all those that are
> not interested in this thread.
I've tried to dispel the myths that you continue to perpetuate and give you
some facts to think about, as have others. I've asked you a question which
you either cannot or will not answer. You constantly fall back to the same
myths and continually demonstrate your ignorance of the OSS and Linux
world. That's either trolling or idiocy.
There's nothing wrong with being ignorant of something but any right minded
person would either listen to others with more knowledge of the subject or
ask questions so that they too can posses this knowledge.
>>> I suscribe to their sys admins news feed so get updates when the
>>> noreboot patches are released.
>>
>>As it says on the page you posted a link to, MS reckon only 25% of patches
>>are eligable for noreboot. Does that mean you don't install the other 75%?
>
> The 25% are patches that currently need a reboot, the remainder do not
> need a reboot with the standard patch.
"Initially, the percentage of patches that are candidates for no-reboot
installation is fairly small. Two previously released patches (discussed in
Microsoft Security Bulletins MS00-067 and MS00-099) have been repackaged,
but we estimate that roughly one-quarter of current patches are candidates
for no-reboot installation."
MS seem to disagree with you. If that information is out of date then post
an up to date link.
-- Andy.
- Next message: J.O. Aho: "Re: Groupware for linux"
- Previous message: Erich Trowbridge: "Groupware for linux"
- In reply to:(deleted message) SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Next in thread: Ian Molton: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
