Re: Video editing in Linux?
From: Adam D. Barratt (usenet+ucol_at_adam-barratt.org.uk)
Date: 11/05/04
- Next message: Andy Fraser: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Previous message: Ian Molton: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Next in thread: SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Reply:(deleted message) SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 5 Nov 2004 11:56:44 +0100
In uk.comp.os.linux, in <418b4d4c.235514687@130.133.1.4>, SjT <NOT@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Kissed me, Licked me, then left me a note:
[...]
>>> That's a good idea actually, but surely it would be more secure if the
>>> maintainer was to run the diff file?
>>
>>Why does it amke a difference who runs diff? as long as the maintainer
>>actually reads the output of the diff program there is no problem.
>
> Well you could change the code to fix the problems, run a diff on it,
> save the resulting file.
>
> Then, modify the code to add your malicious code and send that file
> with the original diff file you made previous?
You're missing a key point. You *don't* send the code, you *only* send
the patch/diff. The maintainer checks the patch and, if they're happy
with it, applies it.
You could send them a complete patched file, but anyone even vaguely
competent is going to ignore it entirely and simply use the patch.
That's what it's there for.
Adam
--
A "goto" in Perl falls into the category of hard things that should be
possible, not easy things that should be easy.
-- Larry Wall in <199709041935.MAA27136@wall.org>
- Next message: Andy Fraser: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Previous message: Ian Molton: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Next in thread: SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Reply:(deleted message) SjT: "Re: Video editing in Linux?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|