Re: Alternative to Mandrake

From: mogens (mail_at_mogenslunde.dk)
Date: 01/03/05

  • Next message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: C-R Systems (Spam Filter)" 
    Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:35:36 +0100

    Lenard wrote:

    > On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:01:20 +0100, mogens wrote:
    >
    >> Hope for some ideas.
    >
    > http://www.kde.org/download/
    >
    >
    But not for Mandrake. The latest version available at the KDE ftp-site is
    3.2.3.
    Redhat, SuSE, Slackware etc. are available as 3.3.2 - but not Mandrake.

    Mogens

  • Next message: Peter Köhlmann: "Re: C-R Systems (Spam Filter)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: OSR507..... cabloooui
      ... I have run RedHat and Mandrake in the past - Mandrake is of course based on ... The latest version Slackware 9.1 is an excellent refinement upgrade for the ... If you are not going to run any desktops then you can safely not install ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)
    • Re: [SLE] Need feedback
      ... I haven't used SuSE 9.0 or RedHat 8.0 or the release version of Mandrake ... It's font system is ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: I am amazed....
      ... > to run to another quasi-commercial package (SuSe) rather than Mandrake. ... each new update since SuSE 7.0, Redhat 7.0 and Mandrake 8.0. ... A great installer with more a more well ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • Re: OSR507..... cabloooui
      ... >> RedHat 9, they seem attractive. ... > I have run RedHat and Mandrake in the past - Mandrake is of ... > I prefer Slackware because it is like Unix and is a little ... You can install a basic Slackware ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)
    • Re: Mandrake vs Suse
      ... > almost the same as in my old Redhat distro. ... something that's a little more trouble in Redhat. ... > The documentation with Suse is not as complete or as well written as ... Never tried Mandrake. ...
      (comp.os.linux)