should I use OpenSSL 0.9.6m or 0.9.7g?

From: Scott (scottg_at_particle.net)
Date: 04/29/05 

Date: 29 Apr 2005 08:02:19 -0700

I'm currently running apache 1.3 with openssl 0.9.6m and have been for
a long time. I noticed that a 0.9.6n has not been released in a long
time. Is this because its no longer maintained? Should I be running
0.9.7g now instead?

I'm concerned I have a false sense of security now because I've
been running 0.9.6m for so long without an update.

Relevant Pages

  • [NEWS] OpenSSL ASN.1 Parsing Vulnerabilities
    ... Get your security news from a reliable source. ... OpenSSL ASN.1 Parsing Vulnerabilities ... SSLv2 Client Crash ... SHA1 checksum: 4136fba00303a3d319d2052bfa8e1f09a2e12fc2 ...
    (Securiteam)
  • Re: The OpenSSL API
    ... if I have an application and want for it communicate ... between the black box approach and the gory-detail OpenSSL ... There is also no one best kind of security for all applications and users. ... OpenSSL is not the most secure facility, ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Windows Is Now More Secure Than Linux
    ... >OpenSSL is compiled into just about every 'secure' application in the Unix ... You know, a lot of people see me as a "Windows defender", mainly because I pop ... The solution, if there is one, to security problems, is to choose a supplier ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Security Vulnerability in Apache OpenSSL
    ... SSRT 2310 OpenSSL Vulnerabilities ... The information in the following Security Bulletin should be acted ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Security Vulnerability in Apache OpenSSL
    ... SSRT 2310 OpenSSL Vulnerabilities ... The information in the following Security Bulletin should be acted ...
    (comp.security.misc)