Re: Fedora performance stinks

From: noi (noi_at_siam.com)
Date: 06/24/05 

Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:07:37 GMT

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:49:19 +0200, J.O. Aho thoughtfully wrote:

> noi wrote:
>
>> BTW, FC3 is a lot better than FC4 so don't upgrade. A lot of good apps
>> are removed (Pan, xmms, system-logviewer) without replacements and
>> compiling compatible sources is a more difficult. I think FC4 is the
>> test OS for RHEL5?
>
> All FC are test environments for RHEL. I do agree that FC has got worse
> with time, as removing the easy to access kernel-source package (now you
> need to rebuild the kernel-srpm to be able to get the proper kernel
> source), it seems like FC is moving toward Microsoft Windows, where the
> user will not be able to do much more than run the official programs.
> Last good RedHat release is RH7.3 and it's still supported by
> fedoralegacy.org
>
>
> //Aho

Yep, but I thought FC was the solution to no more RHs with FC time tested
changes going into RHEL.

FC3 is the best to me.