Re: [OT] The Future of Windows (was: Re: The future of Linux)
- From: "Michael B. Trausch" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 17:00:35 -0500
On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:32:58 -0800
Sidney Lambe <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
He's not a "Linux Futurist", he's a Windows Weenie.
Have pity on the poor feeb.
Now, now... which is more correct: to pity a single ignorant
individual, or to pity the people that are around to suffer the single
ignorant individual?
I'd vote for the latter, and say off with the ignorant individual's
head. Then again, I have a strict policy of zero tolerance when it
comes to stupid people---"stupid people" of course being defined as
those who refuse to cure their ignorance.
--- Mike
--
My sigfile ran away and is on hiatus.
http://www.trausch.us/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] The Future of Windows (was: Re: The future of Linux)
- From: Christopher Hunter
- Re: [OT] The Future of Windows (was: Re: The future of Linux)
- Prev by Date: Re: What the*** is GNU?
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] The Future of Windows (was: Re: The future of Linux)
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] The Future of Windows
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] The Future of Windows (was: Re: The future of Linux)
- Index(es):