Re: Dual Boot; worried about overwriting C: Boot Drive with Win2k
From: Jeffrey Silverman (jeffrey_at_jhu.edu)
Date: 08/24/03
- Next message: john: "Re: Totally clueless, RH9"
- Previous message: XS11E: "Re: Totally clueless, RH9"
- In reply to: Jim Fischer: "Re: Dual Boot; worried about overwriting C: Boot Drive with Win2k"
- Next in thread: TNS: "Re: Dual Boot; worried about overwriting C: Boot Drive with Win2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:51:03 -0400
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 16:06:23 -0500, Jim Fischer wrote:
<snip!>
> That's pretty much it! You should now be able to chain load the GRUB
> boot loader via the Win2k boot loader.
And its a lot! Why not just install GRUB on MBR and let Grub load Windows
or Linux? A lot easier, IMO.
--
Jeffrey D. Silverman | jeffrey AT jhu DOT edu
Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore, MD
Website | http://www.wse.jhu.edu/newtnotes/
- Next message: john: "Re: Totally clueless, RH9"
- Previous message: XS11E: "Re: Totally clueless, RH9"
- In reply to: Jim Fischer: "Re: Dual Boot; worried about overwriting C: Boot Drive with Win2k"
- Next in thread: TNS: "Re: Dual Boot; worried about overwriting C: Boot Drive with Win2k"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|