Re: ext 3 file question
From: dmac (dmacleo_at_midmaine.Icom)
Date: 01/26/04
- Next message: Hunter1: "Re: SCO sues Novell"
- Previous message: jstaff4747_at_earthlink.net: "RH 9 mozilla and firebird"
- In reply to: Jacob Heider: "Re: ext 3 file question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:51:17 -0500
Thanks guys, I will look at this.
-- Dave M Etna, Maine USA Radeon 9800Pro 256mb P4 2.8 oc to 3.1 "Jacob Heider" <lord-jacob@comcast.net> wrote in message news:451ce0b551f65e8f41d8e2ff57fd810d@news.teranews.com... > On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:35:05 -0500, dmac wrote: > > > does redhat need ext3 or will it boot from fat? I would like to get the > > redhat visible from ntfs partition thats why I ask. > > There are linux distributions you can install UMDOS (IIRC) partition, but > linux needs things like file permissions, and really likes having > symlinks. You *MAY* (although I doubt it) be able to install to a fat > partition, but I don't think it will run. Try > http://www.google.com/search?q=explore2fs . > > HTH > Jacob -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
- Next message: Hunter1: "Re: SCO sues Novell"
- Previous message: jstaff4747_at_earthlink.net: "RH 9 mozilla and firebird"
- In reply to: Jacob Heider: "Re: ext 3 file question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|