Technical Reason to Choose Redhtat Enterprise AS over WS?

From: James Thornton (james_at_unifiedmind.com)
Date: 04/28/04 

Date: 27 Apr 2004 17:00:39 -0700

I am trying to find if there are any gotchas for using Redhat
Enterprise WS instead of AS or ES for a Dell 2650 Internet server.

Both the WS and ES versions are limited to two CPUs, but since the
system can only hold two CPUs this is a non-issue. The 2650 holds up
to 12 GB memory, ES is limited to 8 GB of memory, but the AS and WS
versions are not limited so for me the ES option is out.

I don't need all of the pre-installed server applications on AS since
I would recompile them anyway. Further, I have been using Redhat Linux
for years, and I have never needed to use their support services so I
don't care much about the Premium support option available for AS.

Am I missing something? Is there a reason I wouldn't want to use WS
for this Internet server?

Thanks.

Relevant Pages

  • help with kazza connection
    ... I have kazaa lite installed in some computers with ... When my internet server was a redhat 7.3 ... I do not have any problems with kazaa, but with redhat ...
    (RedHat)
  • Re: Request
    ... Perhaps thats why someone or other said he didn';t think anyone would ... I think that was Bill Gates in 1981 or so commenting on the PC having 640K of memory instead of the lowly 64K of CP/M systems. ... Disk drives of the day were Seagate SCSI of less than 100 MB capacity. ... To have a Gigabyte of disk storage on your Internet server was an impossible dream. ...
    (comp.lang.c)