Re: Samba - installing SWAT

From: Tim (tim_at_mail.localhost.invalid)
Date: 09/17/04


Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:29:59 +0930


"Tim" <tim@mail.localhost.invalid> wrote

>> I tended to find the manual the best source of information for how to
>> configure Samba, particularly as the manual comes with the version of
>> Samba
>> you have installed, and SWAT isn't always updated in step with it.

"m.marien" <mm AT RiverCityCanada DOT com> posted:
 
> Yes, the manual is the first source for information. However, I think SWAT
> just indexes the manual.

SWAT is an *independent* tool that writes configuration files for Samba,
based on the SWAT author's knowledge of configuring Samba (it doesn't read
the Samba manual, and if the author's goofed you're using their goofs). If
Samba gets updated and SWAT doesn't, it's still going to be writing
configuation files for the prior version of Samba. Those sort of reasons
are some of the reasons why I don't like it, nor the old LinuxConf GUI
tool.

>> Have you looked at the Gnome tool for configuring Samba? If you want to
>> set things without having to puzzle out what you're supposed to do, it's
>> probably as good a place to start as anything.

> No, haven't tried that but you have piqued my interest. Some of the systems
> I administer are remote so I use Webmin (https) and a secure command line
> shell. SWAT does have it's problems. For one it will delete any include
> statements. I mostly rely on a text editor to make changes.

SWAT does have the advantage of simplistic remote control, though you want
to be careful that you don't open yourself to hacking. But you point out
another of it's flaws - it writes configuration files to do the job it's
configured for, it doesn't handle customised configuration files. You lose
your customisations, and if you wrote something that it doesn't know how to
handle you get a confused config file.

-- 
If you insist on e-mailing me, use the reply-to address (it's real but
temporary).  But please reply to the group, like you're supposed to.
This message was sent without a virus, please delete some files yourself.


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Freigabe einrichten
    ... praktisch alle Aspekte von Samba an einem zentralen Ort eingestellt ... Swat wird im Browser mit http://localhost:901 aufgerufen. ... Ich hab' mal testweise eine Freigabe wie von Dir geschildert auf meinem ... Auf beiden System ist derselbe Benutzername mit identischem Kennwort ...
    (de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc)
  • Re: Need to see my PCs in Linux
    ... > I installed Redhat Linux 8.0. ... Port 901 is the Samba web configuratioin tool, Swat. ... Hat box to a Windows shared printer is a snap if you are using KDE. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: samba install
    ... Check this value using SWAT. ... I've run 'mkdev samba' and there ... >My basic installation procedure was to run custom with the VOLS media image ... It is not running VisionFS and gcc is not installed on this machine. ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: Red Hat Samba stuff
    ... not supposed to use Swat but do your homework in the CLI... ... > I am trying to learn Samba well enough to try it on a real network, ... Using their Samba configurator works fine, but when I try to use SWAT ... > If I use SWAT and build a share, it still updates the same smb.conf, the ...
    (linux.redhat)
  • Re: [opensuse] No localhost:901 in v11.0?
    ... SuSE 11.0. ... samba maintained under the build or similar service. ... swat picked up the settings in the configuration files correctly. ... Samba developer quote of this sunday: My life is driven by bugzilla. ...
    (SuSE)