Re: ATA Raid for RHEL
From: Michael Heiming (michael+USENET_at_www.heiming.de)
Date: 10/28/04
- Previous message: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- In reply to: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Next in thread: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Reply: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:58:02 +0200
In alt.os.linux.redhat Dean Landry <dlandry@cs.dal.ca>:
> Michael Heiming wrote:
>> In alt.os.linux.redhat Dean Landry <dlandry@cs.dal.ca>:
[..]
>> What is the reason for spending the money on RHEL and then using
>> some unsupported cheapo ATA controller?
>>
> To save money. We're a private school, so we have little money to spend
> on hardware. We get RHEL AS for $50US.
Ah, see, that makes sense.
>>>This is my question, what is a good ATA Raid card for RHEL. I want
[..]
>> 3ware controller are fully supported and work like a charm, dunno
>> what you call "reasonably priced", 3ware isn't really cheap, but
>> the can be called "reasonably priced".;)
> I looked at 3Ware, but they don't indicate any support for ATA (PATA,
> that is) support in RHEL (only Redhat 9 end below). If I spent the
> money on a SATA controller and drives, there seem to be many options.
Ops, looks like I mixed up ATA/SATA. I'm running SATA on a 3ware
controller on the box I'm currently typing. Works pretty good on
a workstation, for a server with real I/O, I'd use SCSI only.
-- Michael Heiming (X-PGP-Sig > GPG-Key ID: EDD27B94) mail: echo zvpunry@urvzvat.qr | perl -pe 'y/a-z/n-za-m/' #bofh excuse 50: Change in Earth's rotational speed
- Previous message: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- In reply to: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Next in thread: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Reply: Dean Landry: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|