Re: ATA Raid for RHEL
From: Dean Landry (dlandry_at_cs.dal.ca)
Date: 10/28/04
- Next message: Mike: "installer exited abnormally"
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- In reply to: Michael Heiming: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Next in thread: m.marien: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:26:23 GMT
Michael Heiming wrote:
> In alt.os.linux.redhat Dean Landry <dlandry@cs.dal.ca>:
>
>>Michael Heiming wrote:
>>
>>>In alt.os.linux.redhat Dean Landry <dlandry@cs.dal.ca>:
>
> [..]
>
>
>>>What is the reason for spending the money on RHEL and then using
>>>some unsupported cheapo ATA controller?
>>>
>
>
>>To save money. We're a private school, so we have little money to spend
>>on hardware. We get RHEL AS for $50US.
>
>
> Ah, see, that makes sense.
>
>
>>>>This is my question, what is a good ATA Raid card for RHEL. I want
>
> [..]
>
>
>>>3ware controller are fully supported and work like a charm, dunno
>>>what you call "reasonably priced", 3ware isn't really cheap, but
>>>the can be called "reasonably priced".;)
>
>
>>I looked at 3Ware, but they don't indicate any support for ATA (PATA,
>>that is) support in RHEL (only Redhat 9 end below). If I spent the
>>money on a SATA controller and drives, there seem to be many options.
>
>
> Ops, looks like I mixed up ATA/SATA. I'm running SATA on a 3ware
> controller on the box I'm currently typing. Works pretty good on
> a workstation, for a server with real I/O, I'd use SCSI only.
>
I wish I could do SCSI.... This is replacing a 10 year old Novell 3.12
box though... so it should be an improvement no matter what I do.
Dean
- Next message: Mike: "installer exited abnormally"
- Previous message: Michael Heiming: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- In reply to: Michael Heiming: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Next in thread: m.marien: "Re: ATA Raid for RHEL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|