Re: Fedora on ReiserFS
From: m.marien (mm)
Date: 11/18/04
- Next message: Terry A. Haimann: "Palm ?"
- Previous message: Mike: "Question: Boot floppy disk work with an external USB2.0 Drive where stored the installation image?"
- In reply to: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: Fedora on ReiserFS"
- Next in thread: swamp: "Re: Fedora on ReiserFS"
- Reply: swamp: "Re: Fedora on ReiserFS"
- Reply: Chuck Forsberg: "Which FS type to use?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:25:12 -0600
"General Schvantzkoph" <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.11.18.15.11.04.846146@yahoo.com...
>
>>> swap 1 GB
>>> / all the rest
>>
>> If you have several drives you might be forced to partition differently
>> but
>> if you only have one drive why partition?
>
> This is really stupid. At the very least you want /home to be separate for
> / otherwise you can't do a clean install of a new OS. I always have at
> leat two partitions for the OS / and another one to be used for a future
> upgrade, plus a /home. WHen you do the upgrade you use the alternate
> partition so that you don't blow away your current working system.
>
First, I think an upgrade means an upgrade of the current system on the
current partition. You can't do an upgrade to a blank partition, that's
called a *new* install. However, I can see your point of multiple
partitions for multiple o/s. I do that all the time. My test system has
eight operating systems and my workstation has six over two drives.
However, I didn't see any mention here of multi-booting, just sizing of the
partitions. If he has no intention of putting anything else on this drive,
then multiple partitions on a single drive for a single boot system is just
a problem (allocation of space) waiting to happen. That argument is backed
up by the first reply which questioned the initial posters partition size
choices. Rhetoric aside, when it comes right down to it, the one partition
solution will cover more situations then any other scheme.
IMHO, I think the multiple partitions is a hold back of the old days when a
system had multiple drives. The whole idea of mounting drives on directories
is so that there was a homogenous file system. Why partition it up, just to
put it back together?
- Next message: Terry A. Haimann: "Palm ?"
- Previous message: Mike: "Question: Boot floppy disk work with an external USB2.0 Drive where stored the installation image?"
- In reply to: General Schvantzkoph: "Re: Fedora on ReiserFS"
- Next in thread: swamp: "Re: Fedora on ReiserFS"
- Reply: swamp: "Re: Fedora on ReiserFS"
- Reply: Chuck Forsberg: "Which FS type to use?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|