Re: Linux - a quandary!
From: Kevin Wilcox (kw34272EMAILREAPERS_at_HATECAPSappstate.edu)
Date: 01/15/05
- Previous message: avi-j_at_pacbell.net: "Success"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: Linux - a quandary!"
- Next in thread: Kurt von Finck: "Re: Linux - a quandary!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:04:34 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
While drooling on their shoelaces, Steve spouted:
> Sorry Ed don`t know where you`re coming from but no malice intended.
> My email address is actually steve.cuthbert1@virgin.net and I have the
> `nospam` one purely to get rid of spam.
> I would be happy to email you directly if you would prefer. I have
> absolutely nothing to do with m$ as you put it!!.
What he was refering to is that you posted to alt.os.linux.redhat
from a machine that was currently running MS Windows.
Early USENET postings had a certain number of required headers and
you could use additional headers. Eventually NNTP was proposed and
the required headers list was modified. In time, a good number of
people were using the same additional headers, one of these being
the User-Agent, or the program with which you are posting the
article. A collection of the most used headers were proposed in the
INN standard, but that's really just a bunch of additions to NNTP.
Sorry for the digression....at any rate, what Ed meant was that he
peeked at the headers and saw that you were posting from a MS
Windows machine.
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)
At least, that's my understanding of the situation :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQFB6WpsowlfGIzYCOYRAuAQAKCOG7DuWWwTdVVhkEMQdqIMptuDngCWPq8K
LEZQuxO+7nOQfehB8fDmCA==
=o3qE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: avi-j_at_pacbell.net: "Success"
- In reply to: Steve: "Re: Linux - a quandary!"
- Next in thread: Kurt von Finck: "Re: Linux - a quandary!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|