the future of alchemist

From: Erkan Yanar (erkan.yanar_at_t-online.de)
Date: 01/27/05 

Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 01:45:50 +0100

RedHat ist using alchemist as an backend for configuring cups and
apache. The development of alchemist seems to be stoped for unkown
reasons. Why using alchemist anyway? apart from holding disjunct data?

tschazu
erkan 

-- 
über den grenzen muß die freiheit wohl wolkenlos sein

Relevant Pages

  • Re: NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers
    ... There are about a million good reasons to switch. ... easily run Apache on say Red Hat 7.3 on a machine half what you have for IIS ... NT/2000 vs Unix based Web Servers ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • SV: Apache2.2
    ... Ok, i guess I stick to the version I have then, I realy dont have any good ... reasons to use 2.2. ... Anyone know when apache2.2 wil come on a apt.get install/update? ... as a person who runs on apache 2.0 ...
    (Ubuntu)
  • Re: newbie: popular web servers for Windows?
    ... There are many excellent reasons to front Tomcat with Apache Web Server in addition to security. ...
    (comp.lang.java)
  • Re: Rumours about Apache 1.3.22 exploits -> analysis of so-called exploit client
    ... > something that (for obvious reasons) we don't want on our machines. ... Does this "virus" only affect Linux hosts? ... > Stop me if I'm wrong - but this thread was originally about apache exploits. ... the exploit is in php (unless I misunderstood the ...
    (Vuln-Dev)