FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences

From: JDS (jeffrey_at_example.invalid)
Date: 04/20/05

  • Next message: Ivan Marsh: "Re: FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences"
    Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 12:26:29 -0400
    
    

    First of all, I'm not a troll. I'm a longtime Linux user and advocate.
    So please don't take my negativity on FC3 as trolling.

    Anyways, I've had a *lot* of problems using Fedora Core 3 (and CentOS4,
    which is basically RHEL4, and has much of FC3's "stuff" in it)

    Problems with FC3 (and CentOS4) include:
    * Slooooow! Apps open s o s l o o o w l y.....

    * Thunderbird and Firefox crash all the fscking time. I mean, like, five
    times an hour, with no warning and with no error messages, even when run
    from the command line. And these problems occured with the FC3/CentOS4
    supplied RPMs *and* the tar-gz packages from Mozilla.org.

    * I had a weird problem with fonts on CentOS -- I tried the KDE font
    installer and it borked all my Type 1 fonts to the point where they no
    longer were anit-aliased and some other rendering issues. In fact,
    initially programs that depended on Type 1 fonts didn't run at all. Like
    xpdf. But somehow I fixed that. I'll never be able to trust KDE's font
    installer again.

    * Crossover Office ran very very slowly. Quick as a lick on FC2, but slow
    as my grandmother on barbiturates (and, mind you, Grandma died recently)
    on FC3.

    * Awful bug in gamin that prevented one from using removable media (bug
    *was* fixed, but not in the initial wave of updates)

    * Other assorted annoyances, mostly relating back to the aforementioned
    slowness and instability.

    I've cleaned my installation partition and put FC2 back on it. *And* the
    problems seem to have gone away.

    Has anyone else seen problems like mine? I'd really like to see what
    others' experiences have been. One thing I must say, big bugs *do* get
    fixed pretty quickly, such as the gamin bug I mentioned. But I am finding
    myself tired of the FCx upgrade cycle. Enough so that I am considering
    SuSE.

    Okay, enough on that. later...

    -- 
        JDS | jeffrey@example.invalid
            | http://www.newtnotes.com
      DJMBS | http://newtnotes.com/doctor-jeff-master-brainsurgeon/
    

  • Next message: Ivan Marsh: "Re: FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences"

    Relevant Pages

    • FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences
      ... So please don't take my negativity on FC3 as trolling. ... installer and it borked all my Type 1 fonts to the point where they no ... * Awful bug in gamin that prevented one from using removable media (bug ...
      (comp.os.linux)
    • FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences
      ... So please don't take my negativity on FC3 as trolling. ... installer and it borked all my Type 1 fonts to the point where they no ... * Awful bug in gamin that prevented one from using removable media (bug ...
      (alt.linux)
    • Re: FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences
      ... So please don't take my negativity on FC3 as trolling. ... >> installer and it borked all my Type 1 fonts to the point where they no ... >> initially programs that depended on Type 1 fonts didn't run at all. ... > However I have recently installed SuSE on another machine ...
      (alt.linux)
    • Re: FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences
      ... So please don't take my negativity on FC3 as trolling. ... >> installer and it borked all my Type 1 fonts to the point where they no ... >> initially programs that depended on Type 1 fonts didn't run at all. ... > However I have recently installed SuSE on another machine ...
      (alt.os.linux.redhat)
    • Re: FC2 versus FC3 -- my own experiences
      ... So please don't take my negativity on FC3 as trolling. ... >> installer and it borked all my Type 1 fonts to the point where they no ... >> initially programs that depended on Type 1 fonts didn't run at all. ... > However I have recently installed SuSE on another machine ...
      (comp.os.linux)